In our
experiment, a pack of wolves was hunting four types of rabbits in an arctic
environment. The white rabbits had the
obvious advantage, since they blended in with the snow, but since what the
wolves ate was random (our paper throwing skills were not that great) the fact
that they were white was not necessarily advantageous. However, certain wolves had advantages in
this experiment, simply because they were bigger and could cover more rabbits
(and thereby eat them). This size
variation was essential to their success or failure, while the differences in
rabbits were less important. Every few
generations, a type of rabbit would go extinct, simply by bad luck or the
growing number of wolves. As the number
of wolves grew, the number of rabbits fell, until there were not enough to
sustain the wolves, which would then go extinct as well, and a new generation
of both rabbits and wolves would have to immigrate. The population of wolves would rise and fall
in accordance with the population of the rabbits, and when they both reached
their maximum, the wolves would begin to starve and die. This created a graph of almost sine-like
curves, which would intersect every couple generations.
Generation | White | Yellow-Green | Teal | Green | Wolves |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
4 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
5 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 2 |
6 | 20 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 4 |
7 | 20 | 14 | 16 | 0 | 8 |
8 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 16 |
9 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
12 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
13 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
14 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
15 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
16 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
17 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
18 | 0 | 46 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
19 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
20 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
24 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
25 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
Population of wolves and rabbits over 25 generations X axis: generation, Y axis: population number |
No comments:
Post a Comment